openclawvsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 393 307 | 6 686 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 883 | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Standard Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with