openclawvsSnort
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Snort | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 124 in AI | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 393 322 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 898 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 4 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.5.3 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for Snort, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Snort.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 898 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Snort details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Snort, compare it with