# openclaw vs sms

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | sms |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #11 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 393 291 ✓ | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 943 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 8.0.0 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 48/100 for sms, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for sms.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 943 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [sms](https://selfhost.directory/project/sms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-sms