# openclaw vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 393 278 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 930 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 930 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-scada-lts