# openclaw vs racktables

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | racktables |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 124 in AI | #16 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 393 354 ✓ | 813 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 930 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for racktables, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for racktables.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; racktables needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 930 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [racktables](https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-racktables