# openclaw vs Questarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | Questarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 124 in AI | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 393 335 ✓ | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 911 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 911 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-questarr