# openclaw vs qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 393 291 ✓ | 1 758 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 943 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 52 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.

qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for openclaw.

If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 943 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)](https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qbittorrent-linuxserverio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-qbittorrent-linuxserverio