openclawvsPterodactyl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Pterodactyl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #5 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 393 295 | 9 437 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 947 | +183 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 75/100 for Pterodactyl, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Pterodactyl details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Pterodactyl, compare it with