# openclaw vs porta

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | porta |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 393 307 ✓ | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 883 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.16.2 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 42/100 for porta, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for porta.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [porta](https://selfhost.directory/project/porta) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/porta.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-porta