openclawvsPimcore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Pimcore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #6 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 393 312 | 3 883 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 888 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 35 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for Pimcore.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Pimcore details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Pimcore, compare it with