# openclaw vs PicImpact

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | PicImpact |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 124 in AI | #14 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 393 335 ✓ | 1 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 911 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for PicImpact.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 911 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [PicImpact](https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-picimpact