# openclaw vs ibl.ai/os

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | ibl.ai/os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 393 307 ✓ | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 883 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ibl.ai/os.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-os-2