# openclaw-command-center vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw-command-center | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #110 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 248 | 550 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.1 · 8 Mar 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 48/100 for openclaw-command-center, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for openclaw-command-center.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw-command-center is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw-command-center](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw-command-center) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw-command-center.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-command-center-vs-openreader