# Opencast vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Opencast | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #38 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 509 | 60 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 595 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | ECL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.

Opencast ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.

If you want the quickest setup, Twenty is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 595 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Opencast](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencast-vs-twenty