# Opencast vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Opencast | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #38 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 509 | 393 343 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 919 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | ECL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Opencast.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 919 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Opencast](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencast-vs-openclaw