# OpenBrief vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenBrief | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 580 | 2 922 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +120 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; Zot Registry needs more configuration.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenBrief](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openbrief-vs-zot-registry