# OpenBrief vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenBrief | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 580 | 24 057 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenBrief](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openbrief-vs-temporal