OpenBriefvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenBrief | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 580 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.
OpenBrief ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
OpenBrief details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenBrief, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with