OpenBriefvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenBrief | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 580 | 61 545 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +483 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).
OpenBrief details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenBrief, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with