OpenBriefvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenBrief | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 580 | 28 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+457 stars in 30 days).
OpenBrief details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenBrief, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with