# OpenBrief vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenBrief | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 580 | 393 335 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 911 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 911 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenBrief](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbrief.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openbrief-vs-openclaw