OpenBBvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenBB | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Data Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 74 832 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +348 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 9 |
| Latest release | openbb-v5.0.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
OpenBB scores 87/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenBB.
OpenBB is growing faster right now (+348 stars in 30 days).
OpenBB details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenBB, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with