# OpenBB vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenBB | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Data Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 74 840 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +356 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | openbb-v5.0.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenBB scores 87/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

OpenBB ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

OpenBB is growing faster right now (+356 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenBB](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbb.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openbb-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api