# OpenBB vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenBB | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Data Management | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 74 840 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +356 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | openbb-v5.0.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenBB scores 87/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

OpenBB ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; OpenBB needs more configuration.

OpenBB is growing faster right now (+356 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenBB](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbb.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openbb-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana