# OpenBao vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenBao | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Secrets Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 8 766 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 276 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.7.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenBao scores 76/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

OpenBao ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenBao is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

OpenBao is growing faster right now (+1 276 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenBao](https://selfhost.directory/project/openbao) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openbao.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openbao-vs-windows-arm