# openase vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openase | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #64 of 125 in AI | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 269 | 550 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 13 May 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 47/100 for openase, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for openase.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; openase needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openase](https://selfhost.directory/project/openase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openase.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openase-vs-openreader