OpenAListvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenAList | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 34 in File Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 253 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v3.45.31 · 22 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 52/100 for OpenAList, so it is the safer default.
OpenAList ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; OpenAList needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
OpenAList details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenAList, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with