# openai-edge-tts vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openai-edge-tts | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 141 ✓ | 549 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 57/100 for openai-edge-tts, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openai-edge-tts.

If you want the quickest setup, openai-edge-tts is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

## Details

- [openai-edge-tts](https://selfhost.directory/project/openai-edge-tts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openai-edge-tts.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openai-edge-tts-vs-openreader