# open-wearables vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s