# open-wearables vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 8 653 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-workout-cool