# open-wearables vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 729 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +167 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-wildbox