# open-wearables vs wikmd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | wikmd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #5 of 8 in Documentation Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 ✓ | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.10.7 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 45/100 for wikmd, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wikmd.

If you want the quickest setup, wikmd is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [wikmd](https://selfhost.directory/project/wikmd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wikmd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-wikmd