open-wearablesvswikmd
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | wikmd | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #5 of 8 in Documentation Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.10.7 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 45/100 for wikmd, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wikmd.
If you want the quickest setup, wikmd is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →wikmd details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep wikmd, compare it with