open-wearablesvsWiki.js
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Wiki.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #2 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 29 104 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +143 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 7 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.5.315 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Wiki.js scores 77/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Wiki.js.
If you want the quickest setup, Wiki.js is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables details →Wiki.js details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Wiki.js, compare it with