# open-wearables vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 17 478 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +493 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Wazuh scores 80/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Wazuh.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

Wazuh is growing faster right now (+493 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-wazuh