# open-wearables vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 8 159 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | +199 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Warpgate scores 75/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-warpgate