# open-wearables vs Vigil365

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Vigil365 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 729 ✓ | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +167 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Vigil365](https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-vigil365