# open-wearables vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api