# open-wearables vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 2 729 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +167 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uMap scores 65/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for uMap.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-umap