# open-wearables vs Tipi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Tipi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 9 708 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 ✓ | +32 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v4.11.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Tipi scores 71/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Tipi.

If you want the quickest setup, Tipi is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Tipi](https://selfhost.directory/project/tipi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tipi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-tipi