# open-wearables vs Teleport

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Teleport |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 21 041 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 ✓ | +105 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Teleport scores 76/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Teleport](https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-teleport