open-wearablesvsstrfry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | strfry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #23 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 2 729 | 736 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +167 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 59/100 for strfry, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for strfry.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; strfry needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →strfry details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep strfry, compare it with