# open-wearables vs speedtest-rust

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | speedtest-rust |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 ✓ | 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 45/100 for speedtest-rust, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for speedtest-rust.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [speedtest-rust](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-speedtest-rust