open-wearablesvssolidtime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | solidtime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 9 056 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +128 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 20 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
solidtime scores 69/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.
open-wearables details →solidtime details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep solidtime, compare it with