open-wearablesvsShlink
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Shlink | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 23 in URL Shortener |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 5 380 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +77 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 13 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v5.1.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Shlink scores 70/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Shlink.
If you want the quickest setup, Shlink is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Shlink details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Shlink, compare it with