# open-wearables vs Semaphore UI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Semaphore UI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 14 336 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 ✓ | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.

If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Semaphore UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-semaphore-ui