open-wearablesvsSemaphore UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Semaphore UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 14 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 20 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables details →Semaphore UI details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Semaphore UI, compare it with