# open-wearables vs Rspamd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Rspamd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 4 in Anti-Spam |
| GitHub stars | 2 730 ✓ | 2 559 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +168 ✓ | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 14 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 4.2.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Rspamd scores 65/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Rspamd.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Rspamd needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+168 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Rspamd](https://selfhost.directory/project/rspamd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rspamd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-rspamd