# open-wearables vs Rocketship

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Rocketship |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #9 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 ✓ | 182 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.43 · 18 Jan 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 43/100 for Rocketship, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Rocketship.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Rocketship needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Rocketship](https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketship) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rocketship.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-rocketship