# open-wearables vs Request Tracker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | open-wearables | Request Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 730 ✓ | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +168 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

Request Tracker scores 65/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.

If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+168 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)
- [Request Tracker](https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-wearables-vs-request-tracker